Sports betting athlete endorsements are commercial deals in which a sportsbook pays a recognisable sportsperson to front its brand. That definition is accurate and almost useless, because the most interesting endorsements are not selling the sportsbook at all. BetMGM’s renewed agreement with Connor McDavid is a case in point: the player it has retained since 2022 appears not in odds-boost ads but in responsible gambling content.
What BetMGM actually renewed with Connor McDavid
BetMGM has signed a multiyear extension with Connor McDavid, the three-time Hart Memorial Trophy winner who joined its ambassador roster in March 2022, and the renewal is built specifically around the operator’s responsible gambling campaign. Under the renewed agreement, McDavid continues to appear in that content across broadcast, digital and social platforms, according to the announcement of the deal.
What the announcement does not contain is as telling as what it does. There is no fee, no term length beyond “multiyear”, and no figure attached to the campaign’s results. CEO Adam Greenblatt said the campaign produced “measurable shifts” in how customers manage their play, with more players using tools like deposit limits. Measurable, but not measured in public. That gap between a claimed effect and a published number is the thread worth pulling on, because it runs through nearly every endorsement in this industry.
The misreading: an endorsement is not a safety rating
An athlete endorsement tells you a sportsbook could afford the athlete and passed whatever due diligence the athlete’s representatives ran. It tells you nothing about payout speed, licensing scope, bonus terms or complaint handling. Those are the things that determine whether an account is a good place to keep money, and none of them are visible in a commercial.
The confusion is not accidental. Credibility transfer is the mechanism the whole category runs on: a figure associated with discipline, longevity and clean competition appears beside a brand, and some of that association attaches to the brand. Research on endorsement effects in advertising generally supports the idea that perceived trustworthiness and expertise in a spokesperson shift attitudes toward the advertised brand. The shift happens at the level of feeling, not verification.
Players who treat it as verification pay for the error in the places the ad never mentions. A sportsbook with a famous ambassador can still carry a 15x rollover on its welcome offer, a low maximum cashout, or a slow manual review on withdrawals. The point was made bluntly by the litigation around Mike Tyson’s gambling sponsorship dispute, where the celebrity’s name was attached to a brand whose conduct the celebrity was then arguing about in court.
Why sportsbooks pay athletes instead of buying more ads
Three things an athlete delivers that media spend alone does not: borrowed credibility, access to people who watch sport but do not bet, and a point of difference in a market where the product itself is close to identical across operators.
Credibility and trust by association
Sportsbooks sell a promise rather than an object. A bettor deposits money with a company they will never meet, to settle wagers on events the company also prices. Every trust signal available to them is indirect: the licence, the payment methods, the reviews, the brand’s apparent permanence. An ambassador of McDavid’s standing operates as another such signal, and a loud one, because the implicit argument is that someone with a career to protect agreed to be associated.
Reach into casual fans, not just hardcore bettors
Committed bettors are already reachable and already expensive to convert, because they shop lines and chase the best price. The growth sits with the broader audience of sports fans who have an account with nobody. Those people do not read odds comparison sites; they watch games. An athlete-fronted campaign reaches them through the sport itself, inside the viewing experience, which is also precisely why advocacy groups object to it.
Responsible gambling as the marketing vehicle
Framing an ambassador deal around responsible gambling rather than sign-ups changes what the campaign can claim and where it can run. Safer-play messaging is the one kind of gambling advertising that regulators, broadcasters and leagues are generally comfortable amplifying, and it positions the operator as a steward of the activity rather than a seller of it.
That does not make it insincere. Deposit limits, loss limits, cool-off periods and self-exclusion are real tools, and getting more customers to use them is a genuine public health objective. It does mean the campaign has two functions at once, and only one of them is being discussed in the press release. An operator that is credited for teaching people to set limits is also an operator whose brand name is being repeated to millions of sports fans.
The honest reader’s position: accept that BetMGM says the campaign moved tool usage, note that no figure has been put to the claim, and treat the renewal as evidence the company considers the approach commercially worthwhile. Those three statements are all defensible. “The campaign works” is not, until the data is published.
Where the McDavid deal sits in the sportsbook playbook
Athlete endorsement is one acquisition lever among several, and it is the slowest and least measurable of them. Operators run it alongside tactics that convert far more directly, and the mix matters more than any single deal.
| Lever | What it buys | Primary audience |
|---|---|---|
| Athlete or celebrity ambassador | Brand familiarity, perceived legitimacy | Casual sports fans |
| Welcome offer and bonus bets | First deposits, trial | Shoppers comparing operators |
| Odds boosts and price promotions | Immediate turnover on a market | Active bettors |
| Affiliate and influencer content | Measurable sign-ups per click | Search and social traffic |
| VIP and loyalty programmes | Retention of high-value accounts | Existing customers |
The pattern across the industry is consistent: sports figures front the brand layer, while the conversion work is done by offers and affiliates. It has extended well beyond the sportsbooks themselves, with suppliers using the same approach, as in GR8_TECH’s Mourinho documentary project aimed at a business audience rather than bettors. The McDavid renewal differs mainly in its subject matter, substituting safer-play messaging for the more familiar excitement framing.
The criticism that does not go away
The central objection to athlete-fronted betting advertising is that admired sportspeople make gambling look like an ordinary part of following sport, and that the audience includes people who should not be reached at all.
Why regulators and advocacy groups keep returning to this
British advertising rules restrict gambling ads from featuring people likely to hold strong appeal to under-18s, which has pushed prominent current players out of UK betting campaigns. Other European markets have gone further and curtailed gambling advertising broadly. The reasoning is the same everywhere: a figure whose appeal is strongest among young fans is the hardest kind of endorser to age-gate, because no media buy excludes a 15-year-old watching a game with their family.
The responsible gambling framing softens that criticism without dissolving it. A safer-play advertisement still puts the operator’s name in front of the same audience, and critics argue it buys reputational cover cheaply. The counter-argument is that someone has to carry the message, and a respected athlete carries it further than a regulator’s leaflet. Both can be true. What settles it is outcome data, which is the thing still missing.
If you bet, the useful habit is to let licence status, terms and withdrawal records decide where you play, and to use the deposit and session limits these campaigns promote. Support is available through national gambling helplines in most regulated markets.
What the renewal signals about the next wave
Celebrity sportsbook marketing is moving from the excitement register toward the trust register, and the McDavid extension is one marker of that shift. The incentive is structural: as advertising rules tighten and public scrutiny sharpens, an ambassador who can appear in safer-play content is usable in places an ambassador shouting about parlays is not.
The open question is whether operators will ever publish the numbers behind claims like “measurable shifts”. Until one does, every responsible gambling campaign fronted by an athlete sits in the same ambiguous space: plausibly effective, definitely good for the brand, and impossible for anyone outside the company to grade.
About The Author
